Ingest
Start with P6 or Microsoft Project schedules and the registers that matter. No multiyear integration program comes first.
How Cybereum works
From fragmented state to governed execution intelligence.
Cybereum is not another project dashboard. It connects schedule, cost, risk, resources, contracts and field evidence into a living project model, computes how change propagates and turns the result into traceable decisions and accountable action.
Canonical project state · system viewProvenance → state → CPM 2.0 + EVM 2.0 → reasoning → governed action
Fragmented stateExisting systems remain authoritative in their domains; Cybereum resolves their relationships instead of replacing them.
Connected computationThe graph makes path structure, uncertainty and propagation computable against the same versioned state.
Governed executionRecommendations become owned decisions and traceable action, then the next observed state closes the loop.
CYB / ZK-UPETrust substrate
Everything above rests on identity and provenance that survive the project.
The cryptography remains infrastructure; users see governed project state, not a ledger.
- Persistent identity across companies and phases
- Provenance binding evidence to the decision it supported
- Selective disclosure designed so parties can share verified state without surrendering their systems
01 · Temporal knowledge graph
One model the whole project can reason over.
Cybereum resolves project data into time-valid connected state while preserving source ownership and lineage.
Reconcile
Normalize activities, milestones, interfaces, risks and entities into one versioned state with explicit relationships.
Compute
Run path, graph, probabilistic and propagation analysis against the same project model.
Trace
Every material assertion retains source, time, derivation and the project-state version that produced it.
02 · CPM 2.0 · Schedule & path intelligence
The finish date is a network outcome, not a red bar.
Cybereum reads path families and float erosion to show which corridors can govern completion and where intervention has leverage.
Critical + near-critical corridors
Track the family of plausible completion-driving paths instead of treating the current critical path as permanent truth.
Path intelligenceInterface propagation
Expose where contractor, supplier, engineering and commissioning dependencies transmit delay into milestones that matter.
Network structureSchedule quality before prediction
Reasoning is only as defensible as the planning logic underneath it.
ScheduleIQIntervention leverage
Find where multiple exposed paths converge — the point where corrective action can buy disproportionate time.
Schwerpunkt03 · EVM 2.0 · Predictive performance control
Forecast a distribution, not a single date.
Probabilistic forecasting shows how uncertainty moves through delivery and which decisions can still change the outcome.
Milestone confidence
Represent completion as a range with explicit uncertainty.
Path criticality
Estimate how often a path or activity governs the finish across simulated futures.
Propagation
Carry schedule, risk and interface effects through the actual dependency structure.
Pattern foresight
Use prior project patterns where appropriate without letting historical correlation override current project structure.
04 · Dyēŭs · Reasoning core
Computation becomes an answer someone can defend.
CPM 2.0 and EVM 2.0 produce structure and forecast. Dyēŭs reasons over that computed state, not documents alone, and keeps state, method, assumptions and evidence attached to each recommendation.
05 · Governed action
Intelligence is incomplete until someone owns the decision.
Named authority approves, amends or refuses each recommendation; the resulting action remains connected to evidence and outcome.
This is the cybernetic control loop: project state → analysis → decision → governed action → updated project state.
Stateversioned project facts
Analysispaths, forecasts, propagation
Candidate actionranked intervention + expected effect
Human authorityapprove · amend · refuse
Outcomenew state measured against forecast
First engagement
One schedule is enough to begin.
Bring one representative schedule and one high-value delivery question.